I'll preface this post with a couple things: (1) I did not attend this representing CORE as a whole, as I hadn't discussed with our members that that was what was wanted. I can going forward, but want to have the majority agreeing this is the path. (2) I believe the subject of land use is something that is worthy of the investment of time. You can agree with me or not, that is the beauty of where we live. If you don't agree, don't read this. I am however always open to constructive feedback.
____
Meeting Summary from Cliff of Trailkeepers:
The Format was not the typical Open House, where Forestry already has all of their exhibits and recommended options already laid out. Instead, This was more of a Roundtable format, where those in attendance were encouraged to give input and provide ideas and recommendations for future projects and work.
The main exhibit at this meeting was a map detailing the Inventoried Roads in the Area. Unfortunately, many of the trails we ride are not on the Inventoried System. We discussed some criteria on how to get these trails on the "Official" Maps. We also discussed what WE would like as far as trail conditions.
Some discussions dealt with known problem areas, and potential ways to mitigate the problems, or modify the trail/road to ensure it can be maintained and still be environmentally friendly.
In future meetings, we must provide actual project ideas and give our envsioned plan for the area.
The Next meeting was scheduled for
Thursday May 7th at 6:00 PM.
Same Location
Cliff Planck
____
My viewpoint of the meeting:
I've been involved in this sport a mere couple of years. I've seen places that I've heard people rave about be lost and want to try to help stem that loss. Right, wrong, or otherwise, we find ourselves in the awkward situation of having to 'fight' for use of land that we have been utilizing for many many years prior to today.
There were perhaps 20 people in attendance. As Cliff said, it was more of a roundtable discussion versus a presentation of a plan. Hearing their issues/ideas and presenting feedback or challenges that we as a group saw within those issues/ideas and visa versa. Trying to understand their perceived issue with our use of the land; and trying to help them understand our position regarding the land.
I honestly felt that we, as offroaders, were being given a chance to not only make a difference in the direction of the decisions but to influence their perception of an "offroader". It felt like suggestions we made were being given true thought and not just brushed off. That we could meet halfway towards a solution instead of being told the solution. Realizing that compromise may be needed from both sides to attain this.
Would love to have others attend the meeting in May. I understand though that it is a work day and 3 hrs from most people. So I realize that this will be impossible for some and improbable for others to attend. If you can manage to make it, would love to have your voice.
Here's the website for the Forest Service:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/boone/planni...l_bridge.shtml