|
![]() |
#1 |
EX-Vice President
|
TSL bias ply up front and boggers on the rear for my vote.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
id probably go as low as a 37. but i can never find a set of 15 its always 16's. i should be home in march for about a month so its goin to be my dd then. but it isnt goin to go far from home or get over 50mph. ive been lookin for tires for awhile now for this thing but all i can find are sets of 33's and super worn 35's. a few 42's and even a set of 39 boggers. but the truck has 39s now which rud slightly when turned all the way to the right. so im droppin the size just a bit. the tires it has now are belted mickey thompson. which are worn in the middle and it like to run the road whenever it wants.
__________________
UNITED STATES MARINE 99 TJ, locked, long armed, creepy's |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
- CORE Member -
|
about 30 minutes with a cut off wheel on a grinder and sawzall would cure this problem. I run 39.5" Swampers on my Chevy with only a 4" lift, if I added a 3" body lift 44" tires would be no problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: winchester ky
Posts: 32
|
![]()
I would run sx`s in the front and boggers in the rear that way tou can still steer and the boggers will still push
Later Jeff |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Tiny Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colerain
Posts: 798
|
I've run both and love both.
The SX is undoubtedly the tougher of the two tires ... I've seen Boggers cut sidewalls. SX's also work good in all but the thickest mud. Boggers on the other hand do lack a little side hill capability but it's not impossible to deal width , after running them for awhile you'll find you've altered your driving style and no longer notice it. They also suck up HP and don't do all that great if you can't spin them in hard the mud. I think Boggers climb steep rocky hills better and look sweet ![]() Boggers are also hard on drivetrain parts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
well hopefully he get the title tomorro bu im probably goin to get the sx's. thanks for all the advice
__________________
UNITED STATES MARINE 99 TJ, locked, long armed, creepy's |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 188
|
i agree
__________________
95 yj, fresh fuel injected 302, c-6, twin sticked 205, 3 linked high pinion d60 front, double trianulated 4 linked 14 bolt rear (all aluminum links) locked both ends, 4:56 gears, full hydro steering, high steer, 4 wheel discs, 16" 2.5 fox air shocks, 39.5" irok's. just finishing a full frame-up redo thanks to a great friend and one knowledgable(sp?) s.o.b casey cravens for without him this could not have been done in such a short time and done right! LOOK OUT "WHITEY" HERE I COME!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: van wert oh
Posts: 583
|
i'll x3 this. gives you some lateral stability in the front for steering, and gives you the dig of a bogger in the rear. you could always groove the sx's to give you a little more bite in the front too.
greg
__________________
zuk buggy.....it'll be a jeep eventually. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
XJWHEELING
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colerain Township
Posts: 837
|
Quote:
Nick Go Bengals!!WHO-DEY!!!
__________________
Just a 200 dollar cherokee that wouldn't start .. Ten years later same chrome grille .. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
WHO-DEY is for sure.. but i think the tires may have to hold off for a few. i came across a 94 yj with SOA and a decent set of 33's. so thats the goal right now.PLAYOFFS=WHO-DEY
__________________
UNITED STATES MARINE 99 TJ, locked, long armed, creepy's |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
well the jeep wasnt what it was supposed to be so bck to the drawing board
__________________
UNITED STATES MARINE 99 TJ, locked, long armed, creepy's |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|