Go Back   C.O.R.E. FORUM > Campfire > General Discussions
Gallery FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2012, 06:42 AM   #1
frankensteinxj
 
frankensteinxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Goshen
Posts: 336
305 carb to tpi

Alright ill ask here before I make an account on thirdgen.
I have a 1990 camaro with an tired old 305. I have found a decent deal on a mild built fresh 305.
The only problem is I want to keep my fuel injection setup.
Can I just take all the tpi stuff off the motor thats in it now and throw on the carbbed motor and go or is it more complicated than that?
Thanks for those help.
Before everyone tells me to get a 350 Im just throwing this out there, This is my daily driver and not a race car nor am I expecting it to be just figured since the deal is there I may get it.
__________________
BYAAH!!!
frankensteinxj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 08:14 AM   #2
C.P.
 
C.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: H*A*M*I*L*T*O*N*
Posts: 17
I'm pretty sure the intake bolt holes are drilled at a different angle in the heads. On a carb intake you can enlarge the holes to make it work, not sure on TPI. I think the best move would be to use the heads off of the TPI motor.
C.P. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 08:56 AM   #3
carwash
pimpin' IS easy
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Union, KY
Posts: 3,344
Images: 605
Send a message via AIM to carwash Send a message via Yahoo to carwash
Carb vs tpi makes no difference on the intake to head mounting points. The difference lies in the age of the heads. Older style heads will have valve covers that bolt on the perimeter with 4 bolts. Newer style heads will have valve cover bolts in the center of the valve cover. If your current motor and donor motor have the same valve covers you're good to go.

The newer style intake can be adapted to the older style heads with some simple hole clearancing with no issues I have heard. But I cannot confirm this personally.
__________________


carwash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 10:13 AM   #4
C.P.
 
C.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: H*A*M*I*L*T*O*N*
Posts: 17
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by carwash View Post
Carb vs tpi makes no difference on the intake to head mounting points. The difference lies in the age of the heads. Older style heads will have valve covers that bolt on the perimeter with 4 bolts. Newer style heads will have valve cover bolts in the center of the valve cover. If your current motor and donor motor have the same valve covers you're good to go.

The newer style intake can be adapted to the older style heads with some simple hole clearancing with no issues I have heard. But I cannot confirm this personally.
That's right. I forgot about those mid 80's carb-with-center bolt valve cover engines.
C.P. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 05:23 PM   #5
frankensteinxj
 
frankensteinxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Goshen
Posts: 336
Alright the built 305 is coming off an 82 camaro.
So it should be a fairly simple swap.
It is bored .40 over, flat top pistons, street/strip cam, shorty headers.
I will be buying it for 300 withouht the carb and intake.
Seems like a decent deal?
__________________
BYAAH!!!
frankensteinxj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 05:29 PM   #6
carwash
pimpin' IS easy
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Union, KY
Posts: 3,344
Images: 605
Send a message via AIM to carwash Send a message via Yahoo to carwash
Make sure you can hear it run before buying it. If the exhaust is off it, look in and see if you can see how oil covered the valves etc are.... But for a good built motor, that's not a bad price.
__________________


carwash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 05:40 PM   #7
humpy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankensteinxj View Post
Alright the built 305 is coming off an 82 camaro.
So it should be a fairly simple swap.
It is bored .40 over, flat top pistons, street/strip cam, shorty headers.
I will be buying it for 300 withouht the carb and intake.
Seems like a decent deal?
Watch the cam isn't too wild for the computer
__________________
S10 with a few air shocks..
humpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 08:39 PM   #8
frankensteinxj
 
frankensteinxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Goshen
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by humpy View Post
Watch the cam isn't too wild for the computer
That's one thing I'm concerned about
__________________
BYAAH!!!
frankensteinxj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2012, 12:59 PM   #9
jeepmanjeff
Ah Unz ze President!
- CORE Member -
- Moderator -
 
jeepmanjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fairfield Ohio
Posts: 588
Images: 343
You need to have 20 PSI for the map sensor for the ECM. Other than that, should be good. The CAM is going to affect Vacuum PSI for sure.

I used (Sons Jeep) a 1978 Block .030 over with newer heads, flat top piston (12:1), stock cam, modified the wiring harness with stock ECM and no problems at all. Mine is a 350...tons of power for a jeep!

Break the 32" tires free rolling in second gear and punching it!


vrrruuuummm, vrruummmmmm!
__________________


Keep them on all 4's
jeepmanjeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2021, C.O.R.E. All rights reserved.